On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 03:01:35PM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 5/14/19 11:28 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > > > another straightforward one sitting in my tree... Sanity checked on > > x86_64-linux. > > I suspect many/all of the TREE_CODE (x) == TEMPLATE_DECL > (or DECL_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_P) could also be elided -- we don't have naked > function templates at that point, they're always wrapped in overloads. > Could you see if that's true?
That's what I pointed out here <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-05/msg00718.html> but I thought it might be better to do it as a follow-up. Marek
