Hi, On 15/05/19 14:29, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 5/14/19 5:20 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:Hi again,... so the below passes testing on x86_64-linux. In fact, I think we are on a pretty safe ground, now at the beginning of Stage 1: if, over the next months we get a testcase which causes one of the 4 tightened gcc_assert to trip we'll comfortably deal with it.great, thanks for trying that. Marek found the nits.
Thus, I'm going ahead with those obvious formatting changes, agreed? Paolo.
