Hi.
As suggested by Joseph, the patch is about not copying
target_clones attributes in handle_copy_attribute.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
2019-05-21 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
PR lto/90500
* c-attribs.c (handle_copy_attribute): Do not copy
target_clones attribute.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-05-21 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
PR lto/90500
* gcc.target/i386/pr90500-1.c: Make the test-case valid
now.
---
gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c | 3 ++-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90500-1.c | 3 +--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c b/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c
index 03203470955..517b7e0dd01 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c
@@ -2486,7 +2486,8 @@ handle_copy_attribute (tree *node, tree name, tree args,
|| is_attribute_p ("noinline", atname)
|| is_attribute_p ("visibility", atname)
|| is_attribute_p ("weak", atname)
- || is_attribute_p ("weakref", atname))
+ || is_attribute_p ("weakref", atname)
+ || is_attribute_p ("target_clones", atname))
continue;
/* Attribute leaf only applies to extern functions.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90500-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90500-1.c
index 7ac6a739c05..2b4639ca7f9 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90500-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90500-1.c
@@ -3,6 +3,5 @@
/* { dg-require-ifunc } */
__attribute__((target_clones("arch=haswell", "default"))) int __tanh() {}
-__typeof(__tanh) tanhf64 __attribute__((alias("__tanh")))/* { dg-error "clones for .target_clones. attribute cannot be created" } */
- /* { dg-message "'target_clones' cannot be combined with 'alias' attribute" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
+__typeof(__tanh) tanhf64 __attribute__((alias("__tanh")))
__attribute__((__copy__(__tanh)));
