On 5/21/19 11:41 AM, Dominique d'Humières wrote: > Hi Martin, > > /* { dg-require-ifunc } */ > > should be > > /* { dg-require-ifunc ""} */ > > and the same for pr90500-2.c (see > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-05/msg01152.html) > > TIA > > Dominique >
I'm addressing that in patch that I'm going to install. Martin
>From 14f8d01fccd4d94e9575f7d964faf4144db0879d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz> Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 13:04:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Add missing "" for dg-require-ifunc. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-05-21 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz> * gcc.target/i386/pr90500-1.c: Add missing '""'. * gcc.target/i386/pr90500-2.c: Likewise. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90500-1.c | 2 +- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90500-2.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90500-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90500-1.c index 7ac6a739c05..e90e5ed4674 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90500-1.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90500-1.c @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /* PR middle-end/84723 */ /* { dg-do compile } */ -/* { dg-require-ifunc } */ +/* { dg-require-ifunc "" } */ __attribute__((target_clones("arch=haswell", "default"))) int __tanh() {} __typeof(__tanh) tanhf64 __attribute__((alias("__tanh")))/* { dg-error "clones for .target_clones. attribute cannot be created" } */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90500-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90500-2.c index 0fafb8adb21..cb0658dbc38 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90500-2.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90500-2.c @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /* PR middle-end/84723 */ /* { dg-do compile } */ -/* { dg-require-ifunc } */ +/* { dg-require-ifunc "" } */ __attribute__((target_clones("arch=haswell", "default"))) int __tanh() {} __typeof(__tanh) tanhf64 __attribute__((alias("__tanh"),target_clones("arch=haswell", "default"))); /* { dg-error "clones for .target_clones. attribute cannot be created" } */ -- 2.21.0