Hi!
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 05:09:15PM -0500, will schmidt wrote:
> > * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-premodify.c: Make sure we do not
> > generate the non-existent PLWZU instruction if -mcpu=future.
>
> Should "premodify" instead be "no-update" or "no-update-forms" ? I
> don't immediately see why "modify" is referenced.
The Power ISA calls it "update form", while GCC calls it "pre-modify"
("pre-increment", "pre-decrement"), or "address side effects", for how
it is put in RTL.
The ISA name makes more sense here I think, yes.
Segher
