On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 18:02, Richard Earnshaw
<richard.earns...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 29/09/2020 20:50, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > When mi_delta is > 255 and -mpure-code is used, we cannot load delta
> > from code memory (like we do without -mpure-code).
> >
> > This patch builds the value of mi_delta into r3 with a series of
> > movs/adds/lsls.
> >
> > We also do some cleanup by not emitting the function address and delta
> > via .word directives at the end of the thunk since we don't use them
> > with -mpure-code.
> >
> > No need for new testcases, this bug was already identified by
> > eg. pr46287-3.C
> >
> > 2020-09-29  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.l...@linaro.org>
> >
> >       gcc/
> >       * config/arm/arm.c (arm_thumb1_mi_thunk): Build mi_delta in r3 and
> >       do not emit function address and delta when -mpure-code is used.
>
Hi Richard,

Thanks for your comments.

> There are some optimizations you can make to this code.
>
> Firstly, for values between 256 and 510 (inclusive), it would be better
> to just expand a mov of 255 followed by an add.
I now see the splitted for the "Pe" constraint which I hadn't noticed
before, so I can write something similar indeed.

However, I'm note quite sure to understand the benefit in the split
when -mpure-code is NOT used.
Consider:
int f3_1 (void) { return 510; }
int f3_2 (void) { return 511; }
Compile with -O2 -mcpu=cortex-m0:
f3_1:
        movs    r0, #255
        lsls    r0, r0, #1
        bx      lr
f3_2:
        ldr     r0, .L4
        bx      lr

The splitter makes the code bigger, does it "compensate" for this by
not having to load the constant?
Actually the constant uses 4 more bytes, which should be taken into
account when comparing code size,
so f3_1 uses 6 bytes, and f3_2 uses 8, so as you say below three
thumb1 instructions would be equivalent in size compared to loading
from the literal pool. Should the 256-510 range be extended?


> This is also true for
> the literal pools alternative as well, so should be handled before all
> this.
I am not sure what you mean: with -mpure-code, the above sample is compiled as:
f3_1:
        movs    r0, #255
        lsls    r0, r0, #1
        bx      lr
f3_2:
        movs    r0, #1
        lsls    r0, r0, #8
        adds    r0, r0, #255
        bx      lr

so the "return 510" case is already handled as without -mpure-code.

>  I also suspect (but haven't check) that the base adjustment will
> most commonly be a multiple of the machine word size (ie 4).  If that is
> the case then you could generate n/4 and then shift it left by 2 for an
> even greater range of literals.
I can see there is provision for this in the !TARGET_THUMB1_ONLY case,
I'll update my patch.

>  More generally, any sequence of up to
> three thumb1 instructions will be no larger, and probably as fast as the
> existing literal pool fall back.
>
> Secondly, if the value is, for example, 65536 (0x10000), your code will
> emit a mov followed by two shift-by-8 instructions; the two shifts could
> be merged into a single shift-by-16.

Right, I'll try to make use of thumb_shiftable_const.

> Finally, I'd really like to see some executable tests for this, if at
> all possible.
I mentioned pr46287-3.C, but that's not the only existing testcase
that showed the problem. There are also:
g++.dg/opt/thunk1.C
g++.dg/ipa/pr46984.C
g++.dg/torture/pr46287.C
g++.dg/torture/pr45699.C

Do you want that I copy one of these in the arm subdir and add
-mpure-code in dg-options?

Thanks,

Christophe

> R.
>
> >
> > k#   (use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
> > ---
> >  gcc/config/arm/arm.c | 91 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
> > index ceeb91f..62abeb5 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
> > +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
> > @@ -28342,9 +28342,43 @@ arm_thumb1_mi_thunk (FILE *file, tree, 
> > HOST_WIDE_INT delta,
> >      {
> >        if (mi_delta > 255)
> >       {
> > -       fputs ("\tldr\tr3, ", file);
> > -       assemble_name (file, label);
> > -       fputs ("+4\n", file);
> > +       /* With -mpure-code, we cannot load delta from the constant
> > +          pool: we build it explicitly.  */
> > +       if (target_pure_code)
> > +         {
> > +           bool mov_done_p = false;
> > +           int i;
> > +
> > +           /* Emit upper 3 bytes if needed.  */
> > +           for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
> > +             {
> > +               int byte = (mi_delta >> (8 * (3 - i))) & 0xff;
> > +
> > +               if (byte)
> > +                 {
> > +                   if (mov_done_p)
> > +                     asm_fprintf (file, "\tadds\tr3, #%d\n", byte);
> > +                   else
> > +                     asm_fprintf (file, "\tmovs\tr3, #%d\n", byte);
> > +                   mov_done_p = true;
> > +                 }
> > +
> > +               if (mov_done_p)
> > +                 asm_fprintf (file, "\tlsls\tr3, #8\n");
> > +             }
> > +
> > +           /* Emit lower byte if needed.  */
> > +           if (!mov_done_p)
> > +             asm_fprintf (file, "\tmovs\tr3, #%d\n", mi_delta & 0xff);
> > +           else if (mi_delta & 0xff)
> > +             asm_fprintf (file, "\tadds\tr3, #%d\n", mi_delta & 0xff);
> > +         }
> > +       else
> > +         {
> > +           fputs ("\tldr\tr3, ", file);
> > +           assemble_name (file, label);
> > +           fputs ("+4\n", file);
> > +         }
> >         asm_fprintf (file, "\t%ss\t%r, %r, r3\n",
> >                      mi_op, this_regno, this_regno);
> >       }
> > @@ -28380,30 +28414,37 @@ arm_thumb1_mi_thunk (FILE *file, tree, 
> > HOST_WIDE_INT delta,
> >       fputs ("\tpop\t{r3}\n", file);
> >
> >        fprintf (file, "\tbx\tr12\n");
> > -      ASM_OUTPUT_ALIGN (file, 2);
> > -      assemble_name (file, label);
> > -      fputs (":\n", file);
> > -      if (flag_pic)
> > +
> > +      /* With -mpure-code, we don't need to emit literals for the
> > +      function address and delta since we emitted code to build
> > +      them.  */
> > +      if (!target_pure_code)
> >       {
> > -       /* Output ".word .LTHUNKn-[3,7]-.LTHUNKPCn".  */
> > -       rtx tem = XEXP (DECL_RTL (function), 0);
> > -       /* For TARGET_THUMB1_ONLY the thunk is in Thumb mode, so the PC
> > -          pipeline offset is four rather than eight.  Adjust the offset
> > -          accordingly.  */
> > -       tem = plus_constant (GET_MODE (tem), tem,
> > -                            TARGET_THUMB1_ONLY ? -3 : -7);
> > -       tem = gen_rtx_MINUS (GET_MODE (tem),
> > -                            tem,
> > -                            gen_rtx_SYMBOL_REF (Pmode,
> > -                                                ggc_strdup (labelpc)));
> > -       assemble_integer (tem, 4, BITS_PER_WORD, 1);
> > -     }
> > -      else
> > -     /* Output ".word .LTHUNKn".  */
> > -     assemble_integer (XEXP (DECL_RTL (function), 0), 4, BITS_PER_WORD, 1);
> > +       ASM_OUTPUT_ALIGN (file, 2);
> > +       assemble_name (file, label);
> > +       fputs (":\n", file);
> > +       if (flag_pic)
> > +         {
> > +           /* Output ".word .LTHUNKn-[3,7]-.LTHUNKPCn".  */
> > +           rtx tem = XEXP (DECL_RTL (function), 0);
> > +           /* For TARGET_THUMB1_ONLY the thunk is in Thumb mode, so the PC
> > +              pipeline offset is four rather than eight.  Adjust the offset
> > +              accordingly.  */
> > +           tem = plus_constant (GET_MODE (tem), tem,
> > +                                TARGET_THUMB1_ONLY ? -3 : -7);
> > +           tem = gen_rtx_MINUS (GET_MODE (tem),
> > +                                tem,
> > +                                gen_rtx_SYMBOL_REF (Pmode,
> > +                                                    ggc_strdup (labelpc)));
> > +           assemble_integer (tem, 4, BITS_PER_WORD, 1);
> > +         }
> > +       else
> > +         /* Output ".word .LTHUNKn".  */
> > +         assemble_integer (XEXP (DECL_RTL (function), 0), 4, 
> > BITS_PER_WORD, 1);
> >
> > -      if (TARGET_THUMB1_ONLY && mi_delta > 255)
> > -     assemble_integer (GEN_INT(mi_delta), 4, BITS_PER_WORD, 1);
> > +       if (TARGET_THUMB1_ONLY && mi_delta > 255)
> > +         assemble_integer (GEN_INT(mi_delta), 4, BITS_PER_WORD, 1);
> > +     }
> >      }
> >    else
> >      {
> >
>

Reply via email to