On 12/10/20 10:14 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 04/12/20 00:35 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On 03/12/20 20:07 -0300, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho via Libstdc++ >> wrote: >>> I suggest to replace frexpf128 with __frexpieee128. >>> >>> The former is available on a glibc that support _Float128 (since glibc >>> 2.26). >>> The later is available on a glibc that supports binary128 long double (since >>> glibc 2.32) >> >> Hmm, yes, you pointed me to __frexpieee128 a few months ago, but for >> some reason I either didn't switch to using it, or lost a patch when >> squashing and rebasing branches. Hopefully I just forgot to change it, >> but I'll double check to make sure I haven't left any work on an old >> branch. Thanks for suggesting it (again!) > > As expected, it still works with a check for __frexpieee128 instead. > > So are you happy for me to push this to master with that change? > > (It won't be until Tuesday now, as I have some time off).
FYI, Tulio is on vacation through December 22nd and I'm not sure how closely he is watching his email, if at all. Given Tulio mentioned the change in the first place, I think he's ok with the change. He can beat me later if I'm wrong! :-) Peter
