On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 1:59 PM Eric Gallager <eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 1:50 PM Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: > >> Cilk Plus has been deprecated more than two years ago and not seen >> development on the GCC side for a while, too. >> >> The certificate for www.cilkplus.org expired four weeks ago, so >> remove our link there as we move the Cilk Plus entry to the section >> of Inactive Development branches. >> --- >> htdocs/git.html | 15 +++++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/htdocs/git.html b/htdocs/git.html >> index 305d0c93..41bbe35b 100644 >> --- a/htdocs/git.html >> +++ b/htdocs/git.html >> @@ -442,14 +442,6 @@ in Git.</p> >> <dd>This branch is for development of a C++ modules system. It is >> maintained by <a href="mailto:nat...@acm.org">Nathan >> Sidwell</a>.</dd> >> >> - <dt>cilkplus</dt> >> - <dd>This branch is for the development of >> - <a href="https://www.cilkplus.org">Cilk Plus</a> language extension >> support >> - on GCC and G++ compilers. This branch is maintained by >> - <a href="mailto:balaji.v.i...@intel.com">Balaji V. Iyer</a>. >> - Patches to this branch must be prefixed with <code>[cilkplus] >> wwwdocs:</code> in the >> - subject line. It is also highly encouraged to CC the >> maintainer.</dd> >> - >> <dt>fortran-dev</dt> >> <dd>This branch is for disruptive changes to the Fortran front end, >> especially for OOP development and >> @@ -822,6 +814,13 @@ merged.</p> >> the code size optimization of GCC with code factoring methods (code >> motion and merging algorithms). It is no longer maintained.</dd> >> >> + <dt>cilkplus</dt> >> + <dd>This branch is for the development of Cilk Plus language extension >> + support on GCC and G++ compilers. This branch is maintained by >> + <a href="mailto:balaji.v.i...@intel.com">Balaji V. Iyer</a>. >> + Patches to this branch must be prefixed with <code>[cilkplus] >> wwwdocs:</code> in >> + the subject. It is also highly encouraged to CC the maintainer.</dd> >> + >> > > If it's now inactive, maybe also reword the description to change tense > from present to past? > i.e.: > > <dt>cilkplus</dt> > <dd>This branch was for the development of the now-obsolete Cilk Plus > language extension support for the GCC and G++ compilers. This branch > was maintained by <a href="mailto:balaji.v.i...@intel.com">Balaji V. > Iyer</a>. > When patches to this branch were still being accepted, they were required > to be prefixed with <code>[cilkplus] wwwdocs:</code> in the subject, which > can be used as a search term for people looking in the mail archives for > more information about this branch.</dd> > Also maybe remove the email address, since it bounces now > > >> <dt>compile-server-branch</dt> >> <dd>This branch was aimed at improving compile speed by caching work >> done between compilations. The work saved is mainly related to header >> -- >> 2.29.2 >> >