On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 6:55 PM Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020, Eric Gallager wrote: > > If it's now inactive, maybe also reword the description to change tense > > from present to past? > > i.e.: > > Yes... > > > <dt>cilkplus</dt> > > <dd>This branch was for the development of the now-obsolete Cilk Plus > > language extension support for the GCC and G++ compilers. This branch > > was maintained by <a href="mailto:balaji.v.i...@intel.com">Balaji V. > > Iyer</a>. > > When patches to this branch were still being accepted, they were required > > to be prefixed with <code>[cilkplus] wwwdocs:</code> in the subject, > which > > can be used as a search term for people looking in the mail archives for > > more information about this branch.</dd> > > ...though in the spirit of keeping things here as brief as possible, > how about "Patches were required to ..." and similarly trying to shorten > the rest of that paragraph? > > On Sun, 27 Dec 2020, Eric Gallager wrote: > > Also maybe remove the email address, since it bounces now > > Agreed. > > Do you want to go ahead and commit those changes? Help with the > web pages is much appreciated, and it's quite simple actually > (cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/about.html and I'm happy to help). > > I haven't made a commit to the wwwdocs repo yet, and the last time I committed to the main gcc sources repo it was before the transition to git, and I did it from a different computer, and I'm not sure if I transferred my ssh keys to my new computer properly; I might need some help with the setup there... it might be faster to just commit the changes yourself. > Thanks, > Gerald >