From: Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:29:00 +1100

> Two of the patches have been posted here before; the libstdc++
> patch was approved by Benjamin.
> 
> All of the patches tested on sparc64-linux, and sanity checked
> on x86_64-linux.  I've cross-compiled for m68k-linux, but I've
> only been able to visually sanity check the code in libstdc++.
> 
> Committed.  Hopefully that wraps up the atomic patches...

Why do you need to define TARGET_ATOMIC_TEST_AND_SET_TRUEVAL to 0xff
on sparc if you're going to convert the result into a bool in the
expander?

Reply via email to