From: Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:41:10 +1100
> On 01/27/2012 09:34 AM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> >> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:29:00 +1100 >> >>> Two of the patches have been posted here before; the libstdc++ >>> patch was approved by Benjamin. >>> >>> All of the patches tested on sparc64-linux, and sanity checked >>> on x86_64-linux. I've cross-compiled for m68k-linux, but I've >>> only been able to visually sanity check the code in libstdc++. >>> >>> Committed. Hopefully that wraps up the atomic patches... >> >> Why do you need to define TARGET_ATOMIC_TEST_AND_SET_TRUEVAL to 0xff >> on sparc if you're going to convert the result into a bool in the >> expander? > > Because the value stored in memory is 0xff, and not a boolean. > The boolean is only the result type of __atomic_test_and_set. Gotcha, the changes thus look fine to me.
