Dear Tobias, I cry foul at this point :-) I have gone gallivanting off to try to fix really horrid regressions like 52012, whilst you are have fun doing interesting things.....
Pah! Good call - OK for trunk Thanks for the patch. I notice that you are making good use of recent additions to trans-expr.c. Should we do trans-class.c before the release? Paul On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de> wrote: > Dear all, > > for derived type assignment one needs to call "vtab->_copy" for polymorphic > components. Currently, this does not happen. > > The attached draft patch adds support for this, fixing the > gfortran.dg/class_allocate_12.f90 test case (with STOP removed), > chapter07/strategy_surrogate_f2003 of Damian's book, and the example of > comment 3 of the PR - as well as the more extended attached test case. > > With this patch, all examples of Damian's book* now compile and run with > gfortran. The only exception failures with polymorphic coarrays (PR 51947) > and those examples which use unimplemented features (deferred-length > character components and finalization subroutines). [* see > http://www.cambridge.org/rouson] > > Test case issues: > - I failed to check the result of test3 as couldn't find a way to test for > the result without hitting PR46356 / PR51754. > - For test4, I get an ICE for the allocate statement, cf. PR 52044. > > Build and regtested on x86-64-linux. > OK for the trunk? > > Tobias > <http://www.cambridge.org/rouson> > PS: Other patches which have still to be reviewed: > - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-01/msg00197.html (default init ICE) > - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-01/msg00241.html (ambiguity check fix) > - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-01/msg00247.html (FE optimization) > <http://www.cambridge.org/rouson> -- The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. --Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
