Thanks Jeff.

Best wishes,
Navid.

________________________________________
From: Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 16:48
To: Richard Biener; Navid Rahimi
Cc: Navid Rahimi via Gcc-patches
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] PR tree-optimization/96779 Adding a missing 
pattern to match.pd

[You don't often get email from jeffreya...@gmail.com. Learn why this is 
important at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.]

On 11/22/2021 1:45 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:33 PM Navid Rahimi <navidrah...@microsoft.com> 
> wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> Thanks for the detailed comment. I am attaching a newer version of the patch 
>> which does have required fixes included. Bellow you can see my response to 
>> your feedbacks:
>>
>>> you need to check TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS on TREE_TYPE (@0),
>>> otherwise you check on boolean.
>> Fixed it.
>>
>>> no need for :c on the result pattern.  Otherwise it looks OK, but how
>>> did you check the patch?
>> Fixed it. For checking the patch, I have script which builds and runs make 
>> check for 1) trunk and 2) trunk+patch in a separate directory and diffs the 
>> test results from each directory. My test script did had a subtle problem. 
>> The bug was, because of a typo in the path I introduced few days ago, it was 
>> diffing same trunk+patch test results against trunk+patch test results.
> OK, please indicate that in the future, like with "Bootstrapped and
> tested on x86_64-linux" or so.
>
>> That was a good reminder to setup an account for myself here asap [1].
>>
>> 1) 
>> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc.gnu.org%2Fwiki%2FCompileFarm&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cnavidrahimi%40microsoft.com%7C02e3c84f12dc48c34c7e08d9ae1b030e%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637732253312568135%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=8virYthoelGhRKtjTo1g%2F9GV67I4rze5iv07XnpCpNk%3D&amp;reserved=0
> The updated patch is OK.
I don't think Navid has commit privs, so I fixed up the commit message
and committed the patch for Navid.

jeff

Reply via email to