Oleg Endo <oleg.e...@t-online.de> wrote: > The attached patch is the same as the last one proposed in the PR. > Tested against rev 184877 with > > make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim > \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb, > -m4-single/-ml,-m4-single/-mb, > -m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}" > > and no new failures. > OK?
OK. Regards, kaz