> Oleg Endo <oleg.e...@t-online.de> wrote: >> The attached patch is the same as the last one proposed in the PR. >> Tested against rev 184877 with >> >> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim >> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb, >> -m4-single/-ml,-m4-single/-mb, >> -m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}" >> >> and no new failures. >> OK? > > OK.
I've tested your latest patch on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu with trunk revision 184872. It looks that some new failures are poping up: New tests that FAIL: 22_locale/ctype/is/char/3.cc execution test 27_io/basic_filebuf/underflow/wchar_t/9178.cc execution test gfortran.dg/widechar_intrinsics_6.f90 -Os execution test Pehaps failures might be ones you've suggested in #10 in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 Could you double check? Regards, kaz