On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 12:07:49PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 11:43:57PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> > > clearly there is still work to fix (but seems e.g. most of the lto tests
> > > are related to the gnu attributes stuff:( ).
> >
> > This is looking better than what I expected. Apart from LTO, I expect
>
> I've just verified that LTO is broken even in C/C++, it isn't just gfortran.
> Just do
> make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-mabi=ieeelongdouble\}
> lto.exp'
> on a system where gcc is configured to default to -mabi=ibmlongdouble
> with glibc 2.32 or later and watch all the FAILs.
> All the failures look like:
> /home/jakub/gcc/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/home/jakub/gcc/obj/gcc/ c_lto_20081024_0.o
> -mabi=ieeelongdouble -fdiagnostics-plain-output -O0 -flto
> -flto-partition=none -o gcc-
> dg-lto-20081024-01.exe
> lto1: warning: Using IEEE extended precision 'long double' [-Wpsabi]
> FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20081024 c_lto_20081024_0.o-c_lto_20081024_0.o link, -O0
> -flto -flto-partition=none
>
> Michael, do you think you could have a look? Either it is the ELF object
> created for debug info or the one created by lto1.
I pushed the patch to the branch.
--
Michael Meissner, IBM
PO Box 98, Ayer, Massachusetts, USA, 01432
email: meiss...@linux.ibm.com
