Salut Dodji,
2012/3/12 Dodji Seketeli <do...@seketeli.org>:
[...]
>> Index: gcc/cp/decl.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- gcc/cp/decl.c (revision 184891)
>> +++ gcc/cp/decl.c (working copy)
>> @@ -8686,6 +8686,9 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *dec
>> type = NULL_TREE;
>> type_was_error_mark_node = true;
>> }
>> +
>> + type = strip_using_decl (type);
>> +
>
> I am a little bit curious as to why this change is necessary. It seems
> to me that the test case of your patch would pass even without this
> change, wouldn't it?
Yes, this testcase would pass, but an existing testcase wouldn't. I
don't remeber which one, but I think it was related to using
declarations that refer to a typedef.
struct A { typedef int T; };
stuct B : A { using B::T; };
--
Fabien
