On 04/07/2012 11:37 AM, Fabien Chêne wrote:
Perhaps it is more correct like that, in cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type ?
Even that seems late. Why not just return the target decl from cp_parser_class_name?
Jason
- [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 Fabien Chêne
- Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 Dodji Seketeli
- Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 Fabien Chêne
- Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 Fabien Chêne
- Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 Fabien Chêne
- Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 Fabien Chêne
- Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 Fabien Chêne
