On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 9:10 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > As I mentioned in the original thread, my change to pr94157_0 was an > attempt to avoid these warnings by passing a magic flag to the linker. > Of course we may not be using GNU ld. Or we may be on a non-elf target > where the flag I used doesn't exist. Or we may even be on a ELF target > where those bits weren't added to the linker (frv). Furthermore, we > need fixes to all the nested function tests as well. > > So even though I initially resisted pruning the warning, that seems like > the best course of action. So this patch removes my recent change to > pr94157_0 and instead uses our pruning facilities. > > I'll be pushing this to the trunk and gcc-12 branch. >
Can you backport it to other release branches? Thanks. -- H.J.
