On 4/28/2022 10:27 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 9:10 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
As I mentioned in the original thread, my change to pr94157_0 was an
attempt to avoid these warnings by passing a magic flag to the linker.
Of course we may not be using GNU ld. Or we may be on a non-elf target
where the flag I used doesn't exist. Or we may even be on a ELF target
where those bits weren't added to the linker (frv). Furthermore, we
need fixes to all the nested function tests as well.
So even though I initially resisted pruning the warning, that seems like
the best course of action. So this patch removes my recent change to
pr94157_0 and instead uses our pruning facilities.
I'll be pushing this to the trunk and gcc-12 branch.
Can you backport it to other release branches?
I wasn't planning to, but can if the RMs want it.
jeff
