On Jun 23, 2022, Alexandre Oliva <ol...@adacore.com> wrote:
> libstdc++: testsuite: conditionalize symlink tests
libstdc++: testsuite: conditionalize another symlink test
In the recent patch that introduced NO_SYMLINKS, I missed one of the
testcases that created symlinks.
Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a cross to
aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install?
for libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
* testsuite/27_io/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc
(test06): Don't create symlinks when NO_SYMLINKS is defined.
---
.../iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc
index e67e2cf38f754..e2f3613a3d07e 100644
---
a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc
+++
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ test05()
void
test06()
{
-#if !(defined __MINGW32__ || defined __MINGW64__)
+#ifndef NO_SYMLINKS
auto p = __gnu_test::nonexistent_path();
create_directories(p/"d1/d2");
create_directory_symlink("d1", p/"link");
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>
