> On IRC I've been told that is OK and the that CCP cannot make such > assumtions. Since it is only a missed-optimization if the call to the > builtin is not found and processed (basically PR 51491 again but only > in cases like these), I thought it best to just remove the assert by > the following simple patch, bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux.
Please do that on the 4.7 branch as well if the assertion is incorrect. -- Eric Botcazou