Hi, On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:23:00PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > On IRC I've been told that is OK and the that CCP cannot make such > > assumtions. Since it is only a missed-optimization if the call to the > > builtin is not found and processed (basically PR 51491 again but only > > in cases like these), I thought it best to just remove the assert by > > the following simple patch, bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. > > Please do that on the 4.7 branch as well if the assertion is incorrect.
Done. Thanks, Martin > > -- > Eric Botcazou
