2012/4/4 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com>: > Em 3 de abril de 2012 20:48, Michael Hope <michael.h...@linaro.org> escreveu:
<snip> >> Yip, as is Ubuntu Precise, Debian unstable, and a skew of Gentoo. >> None have been released yet. Here's my understanding: >> >> Fedora 17: >> * ARM is a secondary architecture >> * Alpha 1 release is out >> * Has both a ARMv5 soft float and ARMv7 hard float build >> >> Ubuntu Precise: >> * ARM is a primary architecture >> * Beta 2 is out >> * ARMv7 hard float by default with ARMv7 softfp being community supported >> >> Debian: >> * ARM is a primary architecture >> * Has a ARMv4T soft float and in-development ARMv7 hard float >> >> openSUSE: >> * Kicked off at a hackfest in September 2011 >> * Have a ARMv5T soft float and ARMv7 hard float build >> >> Gentoo: >> * I'm unsure (help?) >> * The Gentoo manual suggests ARMv7 softfp is the default > > I did two ports of Mandriva to armv7. One of my choice to use softfp, > and another hardfp port to be compatible with other distros. But other > than a previous armv5 port, there is not much else of Mandriva arm, > so, it would be "good to have" to be able to run binaries for either > without resorting to a chroot, and only testing purposes. > > Bumping major or calling it ld-linux-foo.so.3 is out of question? I suspect /lib/ld-linux-$foo.so.3 would be fine. There's two questions here though: can the hard float loader have a different path and, if so, what should it be? We're still working on the first part. -- Michael
