On Monday 09 April 2012 19:31:40 Adam Conrad wrote: > I realize that most people can't see past their own use case to understand > why a unique location for linkers is helpful, useful, and important for > some other people's use cases, but you either didn't read or chose to > ignore why using multilib paths just plain doesn't scale past a single > base architecture, and why that's a problem for people who aren't you.
and as already stated, the proposed paths here, free of multiarch subpaths, satisfy the requirements that you've put forth -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
