On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: > I suppose generic tree handling routines are confused by NULL TREE_TYPE > and thus changing the docs to void_type_node would be more appropriate.
I don't agree with that. The documented behavior is much older than either the Fortran or the go front end, so the safest way is to fix those front ends to match the documentation. With my patch modified as attached, bootstrap&test still passes. OK? Ciao! Steven
fix_SWITCH_EXPR_builders.diff
Description: Binary data
