On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: >> I suppose generic tree handling routines are confused by NULL TREE_TYPE >> and thus changing the docs to void_type_node would be more appropriate. > > I don't agree with that. The documented behavior is much older than > either the Fortran or the go front end, so the safest way is to fix > those front ends to match the documentation. > > With my patch modified as attached, bootstrap&test still passes. OK?
The Go bits approved on IRC by Iant, the Fortran bits are obvious, and the rest was already approved. This is r186579 now. Ciao! Steven
