In the BPF pseudo-c assembly dialect, registers treated as 32-bits
rather than the full 64 in various instructions ought to be printed as
"wN" rather than "rN".  But bpf_print_register () was only doing this
for specifically SImode registers, meaning smaller modes were printed
incorrectly.

This caused assembler errors like:

  Error: unrecognized instruction `w2 =(s8)r1'

for a 32-bit sign-extending register move instruction, where the source
register is used in QImode.

Fix bpf_print_register () to print the "w" version of register when
specified by the template for any mode 32-bits or smaller.

Tested on bpf-unknown-none.

        PR target/111029

gcc/
        * config/bpf/bpf.cc (bpf_print_register): Print 'w' registers
        for any mode 32-bits or smaller, not just SImode.

gcc/testsuite/

        * gcc.target/bpf/smov-2.c: New test.
        * gcc.target/bpf/smov-pseudoc-2.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/bpf/bpf.cc                         |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/smov-2.c         | 15 +++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/smov-pseudoc-2.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/smov-2.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/smov-pseudoc-2.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.cc b/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.cc
index 3516b79bce4..1d0abd7fbb3 100644
--- a/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.cc
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ bpf_print_register (FILE *file, rtx op, int code)
     fprintf (file, "%s", reg_names[REGNO (op)]);
   else
     {
-      if (code == 'w' && GET_MODE (op) == SImode)
+      if (code == 'w' && GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (op)) <= 4)
        {
          if (REGNO (op) == BPF_FP)
            fprintf (file, "w10");
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/smov-2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/smov-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6f3516d2385
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/smov-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* Check signed 32-bit mov instructions.  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcpu=v4 -O2" } */
+
+int
+foo (unsigned char a, unsigned short b)
+{
+  int x = (char) a;
+  int y = (short) b;
+
+  return x + y;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {movs32\t%r.,%r.,8\n} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {movs32\t%r.,%r.,16\n} } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/smov-pseudoc-2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/smov-pseudoc-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6af6cadf8df
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/smov-pseudoc-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* Check signed 32-bit mov instructions (pseudo-C asm dialect).  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcpu=v4 -O2 -masm=pseudoc" } */
+
+int
+foo (unsigned char a, unsigned short b)
+{
+  int x = (char) a;
+  int y = (short) b;
+
+  return x + y;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {w. = \(s8\) w.\n} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {w. = \(s16\) w.\n} } } */
-- 
2.40.1

Reply via email to