It's weird. Could you give me the FAILs report?
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai From: Maciej W. Rozycki Date: 2023-10-10 18:18 To: 钟居哲 CC: gcc-patches; Jeff Law; rdapp.gcc; kito.cheng Subject: Re: 回复: [PATCH] RISC-V/testsuite: Enable `vect_pack_trunc' On Mon, 9 Oct 2023, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > Btw, could you rebase to the trunk and run regression again? > > Full regression-testing takes roughly 40 hours here and I do not normally > update the tree midway through my work so as not to add variables and end > up chasing a moving target, especially with such an unstable state that we > have ended up with recently with the RISC-V port. Since I'm done with > this part I can refresh and schedule another run if you are curious as to > how it looks like from my side. For the C subset alone it'll take less. After 10 hours I have now got: === gcc Summary === # of expected passes 194576 # of unexpected failures 600 # of unexpected successes 11 # of expected failures 1631 # of unresolved testcases 120 # of unsupported tests 3828 as at commit cc5033721553 ("Fixes for profile count/probability maintenance"), which is slightly better, but still far from your 92 FAILs. NB I ran this testing with `--param=riscv-autovec-preference=scalable'; I guess I could have mentioned it. Maciej