> On 10 Jan 2024, at 09:02, Iain Sandoe <idsan...@googlemail.com> wrote:

>> On 10 Jan 2024, at 08:49, Jonathan Yong <10wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On 1/9/24 19:37, Radek Barton wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>> I forgot to add the target maintainers to the CC. My apologies for that.
>>> Furthermore, I am adding also relevant changes in 
>>> `libgcc/config/aarch64/lse.S` file to the patch. Originally we wanted to 
>>> submit those changes separately but after the feedback from Andrew Pinski, 
>>> it makes sense to add them here. I needed to rename `HIDDEN`, `TYPE`, and 
>>> `SIZE` macros to `HIDDEN_PO`, `TYPE_PO`, and `SIZE_PO` (pseudo-op) because 
>>> there is a collision with other macro named `SIZE` in the `lse.S` file.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Radek
>> 
>> Looks fine to me, but is __ELF__ correct? I am not familiar with pseudo-ops, 
>> OK if it is ELF specific when PE is targeted.
>> 
> 
> I suspect that, the end, we really need to generalize this so that ELF, 
> XCOFF, Mach-O etc. are handled.  In other places in the tree, typically an 
> “asm.h” (or similar name) is included which contains macros that adjust:
> 
> global symbol
> local symbol
> type
> size
> 
> (and sometimes .cfi_xxxx-related)
> 
> Then  the asm sources are adjusted to use those macros throughout, which 
> means that they build correctly for the different object file formats.
> 
> You should be able to find a suitable example in other ports which could be 
> updated to cater for aarch64-specific cases.

duh, I was not looking hard enough - it seems that there is already such a file
libgcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-asm.h 
It has just not been used in the SME stuff.

Iain

Reply via email to