On Feb 16, 2024, at 2:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > There is one special case, NVPTX, which is a TARGET_NO_REGISTER_ALLOCATION > target. I think claiming for it that it is a lra target is strange (even > though it effectively returns true for targetm.lra_p ()), unsure if it > supports asm goto with outputs or not, if it does and we want to test it, > perhaps we should introduce asm_goto_outputs effective target and use > lra || nvptx-*-* for that?
Since the port people have to maintain that code in general, I usually leave it to them to try and select a cheap, maintainable way to manage it. If people want to pave the way, I'd tend to defer to them, having thought about more than I.
