On Mar 1, 2024, "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <richard.earns...@arm.com> wrote:
> On 01/03/2024 04:38, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> Thanks for the review. > For closure, Jakub has just pushed a patch to the generic code, so I > don't think we need this now. ACK. I see the c2x-stdarg-4.c test is now passing in our arm-eabi gcc-13 tree. Thank you all. Alas, the same nightly build showed a new riscv fail in c23-stdarg-6.c, that also got backported to gcc-13. Presumably it's failing in the trunk as well, both riscv32-elf and riscv64-elf. I haven't looked into whether it's a regression brought about by the patch or just a new failure mode that the new test exposed. Either way, I'm not sure whether to link this new failure to any of the associated PRs or to file a new one, but, FTR, I'm going to look into it. -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive
