On 06/03/2024 20:28, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Mar 1, 2024, "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <richard.earns...@arm.com> wrote: > >> On 01/03/2024 04:38, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >>> Thanks for the review. > >> For closure, Jakub has just pushed a patch to the generic code, so I >> don't think we need this now. > > ACK. I see the c2x-stdarg-4.c test is now passing in our arm-eabi > gcc-13 tree. Thank you all. > > Alas, the same nightly build showed a new riscv fail in c23-stdarg-6.c, > that also got backported to gcc-13. Presumably it's failing in the > trunk as well, both riscv32-elf and riscv64-elf. > > I haven't looked into whether it's a regression brought about by the > patch or just a new failure mode that the new test exposed. Either way, > I'm not sure whether to link this new failure to any of the associated > PRs or to file a new one, but, FTR, I'm going to look into it. >
I'd suggest a new pr. It's easier to track than re-opening an existing on. R. > -- > Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ > <https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/> > Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer > More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity > Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive
