[PATCH] fold-const, gimple-fold: Some formatting cleanups

[Jakub Jelinek]

Hi!

While looking into PR115337, I've spotted some badly formatted code,
which the following patch fixes.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2024-06-04  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        * fold-const.cc (tree_call_nonnegative_warnv_p): Formatting fixes.
        (tree_invalid_nonnegative_warnv_p): Likewise.
        * gimple-fold.cc (gimple_call_nonnegative_warnv_p): Likewise.

--- gcc/fold-const.cc.jj        2024-04-04 10:47:46.363287718 +0200
+++ gcc/fold-const.cc   2024-06-04 10:56:57.575425348 +0200
@@ -15331,8 +15331,8 @@ tree_call_nonnegative_warnv_p (tree type
         non-negative if both operands are non-negative.  In the presence
         of qNaNs, we're non-negative if either operand is non-negative
         and can't be a qNaN, or if both operands are non-negative.  */
-      if (tree_expr_maybe_signaling_nan_p (arg0) ||
-         tree_expr_maybe_signaling_nan_p (arg1))
+      if (tree_expr_maybe_signaling_nan_p (arg0)
+         || tree_expr_maybe_signaling_nan_p (arg1))
         return RECURSE (arg0) && RECURSE (arg1);
       return RECURSE (arg0) ? (!tree_expr_maybe_nan_p (arg0)
                               || RECURSE (arg1))
@@ -15431,8 +15431,8 @@ tree_invalid_nonnegative_warnv_p (tree t
 
     case CALL_EXPR:
       {
-       tree arg0 = call_expr_nargs (t) > 0 ?  CALL_EXPR_ARG (t, 0) : NULL_TREE;
-       tree arg1 = call_expr_nargs (t) > 1 ?  CALL_EXPR_ARG (t, 1) : NULL_TREE;
+       tree arg0 = call_expr_nargs (t) > 0 ? CALL_EXPR_ARG (t, 0) : NULL_TREE;
+       tree arg1 = call_expr_nargs (t) > 1 ? CALL_EXPR_ARG (t, 1) : NULL_TREE;
 
        return tree_call_nonnegative_warnv_p (TREE_TYPE (t),
                                              get_call_combined_fn (t),
--- gcc/gimple-fold.cc.jj       2024-02-28 09:40:09.473563056 +0100
+++ gcc/gimple-fold.cc  2024-06-04 10:38:37.515145399 +0200
@@ -9334,10 +9334,10 @@ static bool
 gimple_call_nonnegative_warnv_p (gimple *stmt, bool *strict_overflow_p,
                                 int depth)
 {
-  tree arg0 = gimple_call_num_args (stmt) > 0 ?
-    gimple_call_arg (stmt, 0) : NULL_TREE;
-  tree arg1 = gimple_call_num_args (stmt) > 1 ?
-    gimple_call_arg (stmt, 1) : NULL_TREE;
+  tree arg0
+    = gimple_call_num_args (stmt) > 0 ? gimple_call_arg (stmt, 0) : NULL_TREE;
+  tree arg1
+    = gimple_call_num_args (stmt) > 1 ? gimple_call_arg (stmt, 1) : NULL_TREE;
   tree lhs = gimple_call_lhs (stmt);
   return (lhs
          && tree_call_nonnegative_warnv_p (TREE_TYPE (lhs),

        Jakub