On Tue, 4 Jun 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> While looking into PR115337, I've spotted some badly formatted code,
> which the following patch fixes.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

Looks obvious to me.

Richard.

> 2024-06-04  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       * fold-const.cc (tree_call_nonnegative_warnv_p): Formatting fixes.
>       (tree_invalid_nonnegative_warnv_p): Likewise.
>       * gimple-fold.cc (gimple_call_nonnegative_warnv_p): Likewise.
> 
> --- gcc/fold-const.cc.jj      2024-04-04 10:47:46.363287718 +0200
> +++ gcc/fold-const.cc 2024-06-04 10:56:57.575425348 +0200
> @@ -15331,8 +15331,8 @@ tree_call_nonnegative_warnv_p (tree type
>        non-negative if both operands are non-negative.  In the presence
>        of qNaNs, we're non-negative if either operand is non-negative
>        and can't be a qNaN, or if both operands are non-negative.  */
> -      if (tree_expr_maybe_signaling_nan_p (arg0) ||
> -       tree_expr_maybe_signaling_nan_p (arg1))
> +      if (tree_expr_maybe_signaling_nan_p (arg0)
> +       || tree_expr_maybe_signaling_nan_p (arg1))
>          return RECURSE (arg0) && RECURSE (arg1);
>        return RECURSE (arg0) ? (!tree_expr_maybe_nan_p (arg0)
>                              || RECURSE (arg1))
> @@ -15431,8 +15431,8 @@ tree_invalid_nonnegative_warnv_p (tree t
>  
>      case CALL_EXPR:
>        {
> -     tree arg0 = call_expr_nargs (t) > 0 ?  CALL_EXPR_ARG (t, 0) : NULL_TREE;
> -     tree arg1 = call_expr_nargs (t) > 1 ?  CALL_EXPR_ARG (t, 1) : NULL_TREE;
> +     tree arg0 = call_expr_nargs (t) > 0 ? CALL_EXPR_ARG (t, 0) : NULL_TREE;
> +     tree arg1 = call_expr_nargs (t) > 1 ? CALL_EXPR_ARG (t, 1) : NULL_TREE;
>  
>       return tree_call_nonnegative_warnv_p (TREE_TYPE (t),
>                                             get_call_combined_fn (t),
> --- gcc/gimple-fold.cc.jj     2024-02-28 09:40:09.473563056 +0100
> +++ gcc/gimple-fold.cc        2024-06-04 10:38:37.515145399 +0200
> @@ -9334,10 +9334,10 @@ static bool
>  gimple_call_nonnegative_warnv_p (gimple *stmt, bool *strict_overflow_p,
>                                int depth)
>  {
> -  tree arg0 = gimple_call_num_args (stmt) > 0 ?
> -    gimple_call_arg (stmt, 0) : NULL_TREE;
> -  tree arg1 = gimple_call_num_args (stmt) > 1 ?
> -    gimple_call_arg (stmt, 1) : NULL_TREE;
> +  tree arg0
> +    = gimple_call_num_args (stmt) > 0 ? gimple_call_arg (stmt, 0) : 
> NULL_TREE;
> +  tree arg1
> +    = gimple_call_num_args (stmt) > 1 ? gimple_call_arg (stmt, 1) : 
> NULL_TREE;
>    tree lhs = gimple_call_lhs (stmt);
>    return (lhs
>         && tree_call_nonnegative_warnv_p (TREE_TYPE (lhs),
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to