Oleg Endo <oleg.e...@t-online.de> wrote:
> How about the attached patch?
> Is that way of dealing with the mems OK?
> What could be a possible test case for the alias info issue?
>
> Tested on rev 190151 with
> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
>
> and no new failures.
This patch is OK.
Regards,
kaz
