Oleg Endo <oleg.e...@t-online.de> wrote:
> This fixes the issue mentioned in the PR's comment #29.
> Tested on rev 190396 with
> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
> 
> and no new failures.
> OK?

OK.

Regards,
        kaz

Reply via email to