Hi,
when compiling gimple-range-op.cc, clang issues warning:
gimple-range-op.cc:1419:18: warning: comparison of different enumeration
types in switch statement ('combined_fn' and 'built_in_function')
[-Wenum-compare-switch]
which I hope is harmless, but all other switch cases use CFN_ prefixed
constants, so I guess the ISINF case should too.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linx. OK for master?
Alternatively, as with all of these clang warning issues, I'm
perfectly happy to add an entry to contrib/filter-clang-warnings.py to
ignore the warning instead.
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2025-06-23 Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz>
* gimple-range-op.cc
(gimple_range_op_handler::maybe_builtin_call): Use
CFN_BUILT_IN_ISINF instead of BUILT_IN_ISINF.
---
gcc/gimple-range-op.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-range-op.cc b/gcc/gimple-range-op.cc
index 90a61971489..c9bc5c0c6b9 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-range-op.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-range-op.cc
@@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ gimple_range_op_handler::maybe_builtin_call ()
m_operator = &op_cfn_signbit;
break;
- CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_ISINF):
+ CASE_FLT_FN (CFN_BUILT_IN_ISINF):
m_op1 = gimple_call_arg (call, 0);
m_operator = &op_cfn_isinf;
break;
--
2.49.0
