I suppose this pattern doesn't get used much! The unsigned compare was meant to
be defined using the signed compare pattern, but actually ended up trying to
recursively call itself. This patch fixes the issue in the obvious way.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/gcn/gcn-valu.md (vec_cmpu<mode>di_exec): Call gen_vec_cmp*,
not gen_vec_cmpu*.
---
gcc/config/gcn/gcn-valu.md | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/gcn/gcn-valu.md b/gcc/config/gcn/gcn-valu.md
index f49c1ed0b6d..71a3916d0a1 100644
--- a/gcc/config/gcn/gcn-valu.md
+++ b/gcc/config/gcn/gcn-valu.md
@@ -3792,9 +3792,9 @@ (define_expand "vec_cmpu<mode>di_exec"
/* Unsigned comparisons use the same patterns as signed comparisons,
except that they use unsigned operators (e.g. LTU vs LT).
The '%E1' directive then does the Right Thing. */
- emit_insn (gen_vec_cmpu<mode>di_exec (operands[0], operands[1],
- operands[2], operands[3],
- operands[4]));
+ emit_insn (gen_vec_cmp<mode>di_exec (operands[0], operands[1],
+ operands[2], operands[3],
+ operands[4]));
DONE;
})
--
2.50.0
