On 5 September 2012 09:55, Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Matthew Gretton-Dann > <matthew.gretton-d...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> Please, no inlining. Think of stack back-traces and their use >>> when debugging. >> >> I would argue [without sufficient knowledge of how easy this would >> actually be to do in a real compiler :-)] that this is a debugger >> problem and not a compiler issue. > > It's also a compiler issue if you take inlining of clones into > account, or scheduling such that the inlined body is scattered all > over in the the caller's body. The compiler can tell the debugger > only so much...
But that's not a problem with inlining, that's a problem with allowing things to happen out of order (for some definition of things and order) - which in my understanding -Og is going to tie down. Thanks, Matt -- Matthew Gretton-Dann Linaro Toolchain Working Group matthew.gretton-d...@linaro.org
