On Sun, 19 Jul 2026, Jeffrey Law wrote: > > I can see the submitter has given up too easily and offered a stripped > > fix instead that got since committed, but I think the testcase ought to be > > retrofitted and I do hope you'll agree given that you claim to be a strong > > supporter for test coverage. > Feel free to improve it. We can reasonably disagree on engineering decisions > like this and I'd happily ack a stronger test which wasn't bound to specific > registers. I didn't feel this specific issue really needed a deeply thorough > test.
I'd rather leave it to the submitter, who has everything in place to do verification and wrote this test already, as an exercise to improve TCL and test coding skills. With the amount of stuff outstanding I'm afraid I can't afford getting sidetracked to do such simple tasks for someone else, it's just too much. Maciej
