Hi HJ, > You use Pmode as the largest integer mode. Is word_mode better > than Pmode since word_mode is DI and Pmode may be SI for x32. I updated the patch to use word_mode instead of Pmode. Bootstrap, make check and Specs2000 are ok.
Thanks, Michael On 14 May 2013 19:55, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Michael Zolotukhin > <michael.v.zolotuk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> I attached an updated version of the patch. Looks like the 64-bit issue is >> resolved in it (now a vector mode is explicitly chosen instead of TI- or >> another integer mode). Also, some of remarks are fixed in it - some >> others are still not changed, because I don't know what to do with them right >> now (see my questions in the previous letter). >> >> Could you take a look at the patch? >> >> I checked it on i386/x86_64 bootstrap and make check, and on Specs2000/2006 >> (I checked only stability). >> > > You use Pmode as the largest integer mode. Is word_mode better > than Pmode since word_mode is DI and Pmode may be SI for x32. > > > -- > H.J. -- --- Best regards, Michael V. Zolotukhin, Software Engineer Intel Corporation.
memmov-3.patch
Description: Binary data
