On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Michael Zolotukhin <michael.v.zolotuk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi HJ, >> You use Pmode as the largest integer mode. Is word_mode better >> than Pmode since word_mode is DI and Pmode may be SI for x32. > I updated the patch to use word_mode instead of Pmode. Bootstrap, > make check and Specs2000 are ok. > > Thanks, Michael > > On 14 May 2013 19:55, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Michael Zolotukhin >> <michael.v.zolotuk...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I attached an updated version of the patch. Looks like the 64-bit issue is >>> resolved in it (now a vector mode is explicitly chosen instead of TI- or >>> another integer mode). Also, some of remarks are fixed in it - some >>> others are still not changed, because I don't know what to do with them >>> right >>> now (see my questions in the previous letter). >>> >>> Could you take a look at the patch? >>> >>> I checked it on i386/x86_64 bootstrap and make check, and on Specs2000/2006 >>> (I checked only stability). >>> >> >> You use Pmode as the largest integer mode. Is word_mode better >> than Pmode since word_mode is DI and Pmode may be SI for x32. >> >>
You should include tests to verify that it works as expected. -- H.J.