On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Richard Sandiford <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Mike Stump wrote: >>> I don't what to bike shed. So, I'm happy if the next poor soul that >>> touches it just does so. If people like recog_data_info, I'd be happy >>> to change it to that. Let's give then peanut gallery a day to vote on >>> it. :-) >> >> Usually we append "_d" or "_def" to structure definitions, so recog_data_def? > > Gah, I wrote the patch from memory and forgot about the bit after the comma. > I'm not trying to be contrary really. :-) > > Bootstrapped & regression-tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install? > > Thanks, > Richard > > > gcc/ > * recog.h (Recog_data): Rename to... > (recog_data_t): ...this. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ It should be recog_data_d.
-- H.J.