On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Richard Sandiford
<rdsandif...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
>>> I don't what to bike shed. So, I'm happy if the next poor soul that
>>> touches it just does so. If people like recog_data_info, I'd be happy
>>> to change it to that. Let's give then peanut gallery a day to vote on
>>> it. :-)
>>
>> Usually we append "_d" or "_def" to structure definitions, so recog_data_def?
>
> Gah, I wrote the patch from memory and forgot about the bit after the comma.
> I'm not trying to be contrary really. :-)
>
> Bootstrapped & regression-tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
>
> gcc/
> * recog.h (Recog_data): Rename to...
> (recog_data_t): ...this.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It should be recog_data_d.
--
H.J.
