On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:04 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Richard Sandiford > <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> writes: >>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Mike Stump wrote: >>>> I don't what to bike shed. So, I'm happy if the next poor soul that >>>> touches it just does so. If people like recog_data_info, I'd be happy >>>> to change it to that. Let's give then peanut gallery a day to vote on >>>> it. :-) >>> >>> Usually we append "_d" or "_def" to structure definitions, so >>> recog_data_def? >> >> Gah, I wrote the patch from memory and forgot about the bit after the comma. >> I'm not trying to be contrary really. :-) >> >> Bootstrapped & regression-tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install? >> >> Thanks, >> Richard >> >> >> gcc/ >> * recog.h (Recog_data): Rename to... >> (recog_data_t): ...this. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > It should be recog_data_d.
Ok with that change. Thanks, Richard. > > -- > H.J.
