On 05/22/2013 02:25 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: > Yes, they are both the same. A while back, I found a couple corner cases > where the TREE_TYPE of the array notations inside __sec_reduce functions > that was getting changed. This is a storage location that will be untouched > so that I can get the original type.
Do you have test cases for these tree type vs sec_reduce changes? I'd like to understand how these types could get changed. This sounds like a bug elsewhere, possibly wrt incorrectly shared trees, and that this field is a hack and should be eliminated. r~
