Mikael Morin wrote:
This fixes the problem, but shouldn't the fix be in gfc_expr_attr instead?
I tried it - but it does not work: In many case, one actually needs a
function, e.g. for procedure pointers or for C_FUNLOC. Thus, I had to
add an additional flag to tell whether the function or the function
result it needed. But instead of adding a Boolean flag to 55 calls,
which can be false in 54 case and true in 1, I think that the original
patch is better. It's the only case where not an attribute it checked -
but where attributes are copied.
Thus, is the original patch okay? Or do you have a better
proposal?http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00027.html
Tobias
PS: Other pending patches:
* Unreviewed: Print exception status at STOP,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00077.html
* PR57596 - Fix OPTIONAL handling of deferred-length strings,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00082.html
