Le 13/06/2013 19:56, Tobias Burnus a écrit : > Mikael Morin wrote: >> This fixes the problem, but shouldn't the fix be in gfc_expr_attr >> instead? > > I tried it - but it does not work: In many case, one actually needs a > function, e.g. for procedure pointers or for C_FUNLOC. Thus, I had to > add an additional flag to tell whether the function or the function > result it needed. But instead of adding a Boolean flag to 55 calls, > which can be false in 54 case and true in 1, I think that the original > patch is better. It's the only case where not an attribute it checked - > but where attributes are copied. > > Thus, is the original patch okay? Or do you have a better > proposal?http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00027.html > Sorry, I didn't see what the problem really was. Yes, the original patch is OK.
Mikael
