Andrew MacLeod <amacl...@redhat.com> writes: >> > The way the standard is defined, any implicit operation like that is > seq_cst. If you want something other than seq-cst, you have to > explicitly call atomic_store (&x, 0, model).
Thanks. This doesn't sound like a good default for x86. seq_cst requires somewhat expensive extra barriers that most people most likely don't need. -Andi -- a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
