On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Andrew MacLeod wrote:

> complex I hadn't thought about until just now, I'll have to look.  I know we
> can deal with parts on complex sometimes.   Hopefully at gimplification time
> we still have the whole complex reference and if we just take care of that
> with the atomic builtins, we'll maintain the entire thing as we need.

You have things in a fairly complicated form, building up COMPLEX_EXPRs 
out of operations on the individual parts of the complex operands.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com

Reply via email to