On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > complex I hadn't thought about until just now, I'll have to look. I know we > can deal with parts on complex sometimes. Hopefully at gimplification time > we still have the whole complex reference and if we just take care of that > with the atomic builtins, we'll maintain the entire thing as we need.
You have things in a fairly complicated form, building up COMPLEX_EXPRs out of operations on the individual parts of the complex operands. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
